China Net/China Development Portal News Technology Newzealand Sugar technology export control is a country or region’s political, economic, and diplomatic reasons. or military purposes, through government intervention to control technology exports. In order to safeguard national security and interests, developed countries and regions such as the United States, Europe, and Japan attach great importance to the export control of high and new technologies, and have gradually established an increasingly complete technology export control system. In recent years, as my country’s scientific and technological strength continues to increase, the United States and other countries have continued to generalize the concept of national security and abuse technology export controls, unilateral sanctions, “long-arm jurisdiction” and other tools and means to comprehensively contain and suppress my country’s scientific and technological development. . In this context, it is extremely urgent and necessary to establish and improve a modern technology export control system to effectively safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests. In view of this, this article systematically reviews the development and latest trends of foreign technology export control systems, analyzes the impact of increasingly stringent control measures on my country’s scientific and technological innovation, and studies and proposes my country’s response strategies and policy recommendations.
Theoretical basis and research progress of technology export control
The implementation of scientific and reasonable technology export control is used by sovereign countries to maintain their technology monopoly and maintain local security. and the objective requirements and inevitable choices of interests. However, out of the need to maintain its own technological hegemony, the use of technology export control measures to suppress and contain other countries has seriously damaged the legitimate interests of other countries and the normal order of international exchanges.
Theoretical basis
The field of export control has not yet formed a widely accepted viewNZ Escorts There is no unified theory, but the economic analysis of technological innovation and diffusion, technology export control and related strategic trade theory, economic globalization theory, etc., provide theoretical explanations for reasonable technology export control behavior.
The characteristics of technology determine the necessity of export control. Due to the long cycle of technological innovation activities, large scale of investment, high failure rate, and strong uncertainty, and the output of technological innovation has quasi-public product properties such as delay, spillover, and divergence, these intangible knowledge and materialized products can Overflow occurs at any stage or link of technological innovation. It is necessary for technology-leading countries to limit the diffusion of technology at home and abroad through intellectual property protection. On the one hand, it restricts the export of key core technologies and maintains its “exclusive rights” or “exclusive rights” over advanced technologies. Newzealand Sugar maintains International technological leadership and industrial competitiveness; on the other hand, we have established a complete intellectual property protection system internally to protect the interests and innovation enthusiasm of local researchers.
Technology export control is a manifestation of government coercion. Technology export control is a state behavior and has political, economic and social aspects. Due to the existence of natural monopoly, externalities and information asymmetry, Lan Yuhua lay down on the bed, took a deep breath slowly, calmed down a little, and then spoke in a calm tone. “Mother, since the Xi family wants to break up, let him and other factors require the government to implement appropriate and effective controls on technology exports to overcome market failures. On the one hand, by restricting or prohibiting the external export of advanced technologies, priority must be given to satisfying The short-term demand and long-term competition needs of local related industries, while effectively avoiding the negative externalities caused by technology spillover to technology-leading countries, and maintaining their economic security in the international market; on the other hand, by formulating strict technology export control standards to prohibit Export of sensitive or dual-use items and technologies, reduce the risk of related items falling into hostile countries or competitor countries, and safeguard national security [3].
The effective implementation of technology export controls requires balancing the interests of all parties. Relationship. Technology export control is a “double-edged sword.” Moderate technology export control not only enables technology-leading countries to gain substantial economic benefits, but also controls late-developing countries by exporting technical standards systems based on their own technical standards and specifications. technology catch-up path; however, excessive control allows the controlling country to gain political, military and diplomatic benefits, but also increases the production costs of its own technological products, damaging the economic interests and technological innovation capabilities of related industries. Therefore, technological leadership needs. According to national strategic needs, the technology gap should be maintained by restricting or even banning the export of key core technologies and delaying the time lag in technological catch-up as much as possible; at the same time, the export control of mature technologies should be relaxed to gain access to overseas markets and feed back domestic technological innovation by obtaining economic benefits.
Research Progress
The frequent use and widespread impact of technology export controls have attracted common attention from multiple disciplines and become a hot topic for domestic and foreign scholars. Related research mainly Focusing on the development and evolution of Sugar Daddy technology export control in typical countries, the purpose and content of technology export control, the effects and impact of technology export control, etc. .
The purpose of implementing technology export control. Technology export control policy is an important way for developed countries to implement discriminatory trade policies. Existing research has systematically sorted out the historical evolution of technology export control policies in developed countries. An in-depth analysis of the origins of the control was conducted, and it was believed that the core mission of technology export control is to maintain national security, including military security, economic security, scientific and technological security, etc. Economically it can enhance the country’s industrial competitiveness and economic advantages, and militarily it can maintain the country’s military. The advancement of equipment and military technology can maintain the country’s leading position in specific scientific and technological fields. Technology export control is also a way for leading countries to curb the rise and development of late-developing countries and prevent the technological progress of late-developing countries.Strategic motivations for maintaining international competitive advantage. The United States has regarded technology export controls as the most important means to contain China’s development.
Means for implementing technology export controls. Technology export is an export of technical level and creative ability. High-tech export control not only includes the technology and product itself, but also the carrier of the technology. Through multi-faceted control of different technology forms, it can effectively prevent technology transfer and proliferation. Developed countries mainly implement technology export controls through control lists, such as the “item control list” that controls export items and the “entity control list” that controls users. Existing research has attempted to sort out and analyze text contents such as the Commercial Control List, Wassenaar List, and Entity List from the perspective of information science, and explore the strategic intentions contained in the lists, as well as the changes in export control situations. It also analyzes potential risks and impacts from the linkage between export control policies, foreign investment security review and “long-arm jurisdiction”. At the same time, the evolution, role and challenges of the international multilateral export control mechanism are analyzed.
Influencing factors of technology export control. The technology export control policies of developed countries are not static, but are dynamically adjusted with the times. The main influencing factor that promotes the adjustment of technology export control policies is international political relations. Usually, strict export control measures are applicable to periods of tense relations between the two countries, while loose export control measures are mainly targeted at allied countries. Economic factors are an important consideration in technology export control. By seeking economic benefits, the purpose of safeguarding national security is ultimately achieved. The gap in technological innovation will also change the export control standards. Especially when the controlled country breaks through the technological blockade through independent innovation, the original export standards are in urgent need of adjustment. This reflects the update and iteration of technology on the one hand, and on the other hand reflects the changes in the controlled country. technological progress. In addition, differences in technological innovation systems will also affect changes in technology export control standards.
The effects of implementing technology export controls. Technology export controls will have varying degrees of impact on policy stakeholders. For controlling countries, existing studies have shown that there is an “inverted U-shaped” relationship between export controls and industrial technological innovation. Moderate export controls are helpful for industrial technological innovation, but excessive export controls have a negative impact on industrial technological innovation. For controlled countries, relevant research has confirmed through various theoretical and empirical studies such as the “North-South Trade Model” and “Leapfrog Model” that the import of high-tech products plays an important role in promoting the improvement of a country’s product research and development. Export control The policy distorts normal trade behavior to a certain extent, causing the research and development of high-tech products in the controlled countries to be affected to varying degrees; but it also helps the controlled countries increase their independent research and development efforts and reduce or even get rid of their dependence on foreign technologies through independent innovation. . In addition to technical effects, the implementation of technology export controls will also produce security effects, trade effects, policy effects, etc.
Generally speaking, existing research has carried out rich discussions on technology export control, but the comprehensiveness and systematicness are still insufficient. For example, many documents take the policy texts of specific countries as the analysis object, and many of them Mainly qualitative research, lack of technicalAn overall consideration of the development, evolution, basic characteristics, cutting-edge trends and countermeasure analysis of the technical export control system.
The development and evolution of foreign technology export controls
In modern society, technological innovation plays an increasingly important role in the world economy and international trade, and It has a profound impact on the pattern of international cooperation and competition. Technology export control has gradually become an important strategic tool for major countries in the world, and has become a common rule and practice generally accepted by the international community.
The development history of technology export controls
Western developed countries began to implement technology export controls at the beginning of the 20th century to restrict hostile countries. After a century of development, more and more countries have established increasingly complete technology export control systems to safeguard national security and development interests.
The embryonic stage (1917 – the end of World War II)
Technology export controls in the modern sense were first established in the first half of the 20th century. In 1917, the United States passed the “Trading with the Enemy Act”, which authorized the President of the United States to strictly restrict any economic and trade activities with hostile countries during the war. In 1939, with the outbreak of World War II, the United Kingdom and France successively promulgated and implemented the “Import, Export and Customs Rights Law” and the “Decree on the Establishment of a System for the Management of War Materials, Weapons and Munitions”, which clearly prohibited the export of military equipment and weapons without a license. , ammunition, etc. In 1940, the United States strengthened the power of the President of the United States to impose export controls on goods and technologies of great military significance in accordance with the “National Defense Promotion and Strengthening Act” to hinder the increase of the military strength of hostile countries. Technology export control at this stage has just sprouted. It is a temporary measure to implement material embargoes and technology export restrictions against hostile countries during wars. It is an act to safeguard national military securityNZ Escorts.
Development Stage (End of World War II – Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union)
After the end of World War II, the two poles of the world marked by the confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union gradually formed during the Cold War. pattern. In 1949, the United States passed the Export Control Act, solidifying temporary wartime export control measures into export control policies at the national security and diplomatic levels, prohibiting the export of related items involving high-precision technologies through economic and trade channelsSugar Daddy supplies equipment; at the same time, the United States collaborated with most Western European countries to form the “Paris Coordination Committee” (referred to as “Batumi”) to jointly implement measures against socialist countries Multilateral export controls prevent the United States’ advanced technology and high-tech strategic materials from spreading to the socialist camp. This also marks the expansion of export controls from the unilateral to the multilateral level. After the establishment of Batumi in 1950, the “No Expansion”International multilateral export control systems such as the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, the Convention on the Prohibition of Biological Weapons, the Nuclear Suppliers Group, and the Missile Technology Control Regime have been successively introduced and established.
With the continuous changes in the international political and economic environment, the U.S. export control policy has been revised and improved many times at different times during this stage. In 1953, in order to ease financial pressure, the United States narrowed the scope of export controls and gradually relaxed export controls on socialist countries except in the field of defense technology. In 1969, the United States introduced the “Export Administration Act” and adjusted the “comprehensive embargo” policy into targeted export controls. The controls focused on items and technologies that could significantly enhance the potential military capabilities of opponents. In 1979, the United States promulgated the Export Administration Act, the Export Administration Regulations and other laws and regulations, expanding the focus of control in the field of military and civilian dual-use goods from traditional tangible goods to intangible technologies, further relaxing export restrictions on mature technologies, and strengthening high-tech Control. During this period, the United States’ attitude towards its allies also changed greatly. Throughout the second half of the Cold War, in the face of technological competition from Japan and Europe, the United States on the one hand strengthened its support for industries in the high-tech field; on the other hand, it Some high-tech industries implement extremely strict export controls. At this stage, other Western developed countries and regions also updated or formulated their own technology export control policies: the United Kingdom revised and promulgated the “1990 Export Control Act”; France revised the original act based on the content of “Batum” and continued to use it; Japan in 1949 The Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Law was promulgated in 2016 as the core basis for regulating foreign trade activities and implementing technology export controls; Germany introduced the War Weapons Control Law and the Foreign Economic Law in 1961 as the legal basis for controlling the export of dual-use goods, both military and civilian; the European Union In 1994, Regulation (EC) No. 3381/94 was issued to formally establish the EU’s common rules for unified export control.
Technology export control at this stage has been greatly developed. The purpose of control has expanded from maintaining military security to maintaining military security and ensuring economic security. The form of control has expanded from unilateral to multilateral, and the control objects have expanded from military products to Dual-use for both military and civilian use. Generally speaking, the export controls imposed by the United States and its allies on socialist countries mainly focus on defense technology, mainly to prevent the spread of sensitive technologies to hostile countries. The United States’ high-tech industry export controls on Japan, Europe and other allies are mainly focused on the economic level, aiming to maintain high-tech monopoly advantages.
Improvement stage (the end of the Cold War – 2016)
After the end of the Cold War, major changes have taken place in the world structure, with the rise of the knowledge economy and the process of economic globalization. Science and technology competition has become the core of international competition. More and more countries regard science and technology as the foundation of their country, and strengthen the control of technology exports and strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights to maintain their country’s leading position and ensure national security.
The United States has established a hierarchical and classified technology export control system. From the end of the Cold War to the outbreak of the financial crisis, the United States comprehensively adjusted its technology exportsControl strategies and measures. In terms of export control policies, technology export restrictions have been appropriately relaxed and export control procedures have been simplified; a new dedicated agency has been established to coordinate export control; the technology export list has been adjusted to strengthen the control of technological products with high technical content. After the “911” incident, the United States elevated the prevention of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and technology to its national security strategy, established a complete intellectual property protection system domestically, and promoted the adoption of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement at the multilateral level. Strengthen technology diffusion control. After the financial crisis, facing new threats and a changing international environment, the United States launched the reform of the export control system in 2010 and established a unified hierarchical control list, licensing agencies, and adequate law enforcement coordination. Institutions and information technology platforms have greatly improved the efficiency of export control. Japan further strengthens its technology export control system. In 2002, Japan implemented a “comprehensive control” system targeting all items and technologies. In 2009, it promulgated amendments to the “Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Law”, which expanded the scope of technology export review objects and increased penalties for violations. The EU has expanded and improved its unified technology export control policy. The EU issued the “Regulations on Export Control of Dual-Use Items” to establish a unified export control policy and a jointly implemented control list.
In addition, developing countries have gradually entered the ranks of countries with technology export controls. At the multilateral level, with the disintegration of the Soviet Union, “Batumi” was disbanded in 1994. In 1995, the Wassenaar Agreement on Export Controls of Conventional Arms and Dual-use Articles and Technologies (hereinafter referred to as the Wassenaar Agreement) was established as a new multilateral export control tool, which inherited the “Batumi” The operating model achieves the supervision and control of dual-use items through information sharing and negotiation among participants.
The technology export control system at this stage has gradually matured, and the world’s major developed and developing countries have successively established unique technology export control systems. Developed countries have generally established a relatively complete legal system for export control, set up professional and coordinated control agencies, formed a list of technology control classifications and clear categories of technology export activities, implemented all-round controls for different technology forms, and implemented multilateral international Cooperate to implement joint control. Developing countries mainly focus on non-proliferation-related technologies in the military field and dual-use fields. Technology export control has become an important tool to safeguard the overall national security and interests.
Generalization stage (2017 to present)
Since 2017, the world has entered a period of turbulence and change, with unprecedented increases in instability and uncertainty. Key technologies and emerging technologies have become the core strategic resources in the competition between major powers. In 2018, the United States passed the Export Control Reform Act, which incorporated the current export control system practices into legislation, providing a permanent legal basis for technology export control. At the same time, it strengthened export control rights and gave the export control system the ability to have “long-arm jurisdiction” Effectiveness, expand the scope of export controls, and add restrictions on “emerging and basic technologies”. 2021In 2018, the EU passed new regulations on the export control of dual-use items – “Regulations on the establishment of an EU control system for the control of exports, intermediaries, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items” to further expand and improve the unified export control policy , to improve the effectiveness of EU technology export controls.
At this stage, as the technological competition between China and the United States and the conflict between Russia and Ukraine continue to escalate, individual countries represented by the United States have generalized national security and abused technology export control measures as a way to implement technology sanctions and safeguard As a tool of technological hegemony, it interferes with or even cuts off normal trade, investment, finance, and personnel exchanges, endangers the stability of international industrial and supply chains, and causes serious interference to the sustainable development of various countries. The technology export control systems of major countries/regions are shown in Table 1.
Basic model of technology export control
Although the motivations and purposes of technology export control in different countries and regions are diverse, the structure of the control subjects varies. Although they are all the same, the focus of control is not exactly the same, and the degree of strictness of control is also different. However, the control methods are generally the same, and both have formed a list of technology control classifications and clear categories of technology export activities. Mainly manifested as item control and entity control.
Item Control
The item list builds a complete control network for high-tech and its applications. Through the synthesis of the item list and related content Through analysis, we can discover a country’s regulatory status, relations between countries, and even get a glimpse of the current status and trends of technology development, the gap in technology and industrial competitiveness between countries, and the technological progress of the regulated countries. Typical item control lists include the “Commercial Control List” of the United States, the “Strategic Export Control List” of the United Kingdom, and the “EU Dual-use Item Control” of the European Union NZ EscortsList” and more.
The list of items in major developed countries is not only complete and detailed, but also has very clear control standards for specific technology categories and the scope of export activities. Strategic adjustments and the development of technological levels in controlled countries are updated in real time. Taking the U.S. Commercial Control List (CCL) as an example, it divides controlled items into 10 categories (0-9) and 5 groups (A-E) in a list-based manner, and passes the Export Control Classification Code (ECCN) Manage based on product final destination and control reasons. The Export Administration Regulations establishes a country table that covers all countries except the United StatesCountries are divided into four categories: A, B, D, and E. Countries in different groups are subject to different embargoes, license exemptions, and transshipment requirements. Similar to the United States, the EU dual-use item control list codes controlled items and describes technical parameters, export objects, licensing conditions, etc. The control list will be updated every year according to relevant institutional arrangements. Japan’s “Foreign Exchange Order” and “Export Trade Control Order” classify controlled technologies into 16 categories, and implement comprehensive technology control for all regions except the 27 white list countries.
As of the end of June 2023, a total of 603 categories (ECCN) items in CCL are controlled, involving 3 37Zelanian sugar9 Zelanian sugar specific controlled substances. Among them, the three fields of special materials/chemicals, aerospace and propulsion, and material processing have a large number of controlled items. Figure 1 is the distribution of the number of controlled items in CCL for Canada, Japan, China, and North Korea in the past 10 years. As of June 2023, the proportions of controlled items in the above four countries are 4.15% and 59.54 respectively. %, 76.62% and 89.88%. It can be found that, in addition to Canada, which has the closest relationship with the United States, the number of controlled items has always been small, Japan, which has established an alliance with the United States, China, which has had tense relations with the United States in recent years, and North Korea, which is subject to unilateral sanctions by the United States, have controlled items The number of major categories has maintained the same growth trend, indicating that the United States has long implemented strict technology export controls on different countries.
Entity Control
The Entity Control List is essentially an import and export blacklist. Once on the list, it means that you are restricted or even banned. Denying access to trade opportunities for regulated technologies and products with controlling countries. The entity control list covers various organizations and personnel such as enterprises, scientific research institutions, governments, and individuals. Typical entity control lists include the United States’ Entity List, the United Kingdom’s Comprehensive Financial Sanctions List, and the European Union’s EU Sanctions Chart, etc.
Technology export control agencies will develop multiple entity control lists for different entities based on their own scope of responsibilities. Taking the United States as an example, its Entity Control List consists of the Entity List, the Unverified List, the End Military User List, and the Denied Persons List.According to complete statistics, there are as many as 19 types of Sugar Daddy (Figure 2). Some lists specifically control specific companies (such as military-related companies) or behaviors (such as military-civilian integration); some lists serve as warnings and do not impose substantive restrictions on companies on the list but increase review procedures to obtain company information; some lists use a financial perspective to Restrictions on corporate investment and financing; there are also lists that directly impose mandatory prohibitions on entities. Different types of lists focus on different transactions and objects, but there is also some overlap. Through the hierarchical and classified management of different types of lists, various flows of controlled items are restricted or prohibited.
The “Entity List” of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) was first announced in 1997. The entities initially included in the list were related to weapons of mass destruction. , and later the list was expanded to include entities that “engage in activities sanctioned and prohibited by the U.S. Department of State and endanger U.S. national security and diplomatic interests.” As of July 22, 2023, a total of 2,554 entities in 89 countries/regions around the world have been included in the entity restricted list. Among them, Russia ranks first with 881 controlled entities, followed by China with 696 controlled entities. The number of controlled entities in the two countries accounts for 61.74% of the total entity list (Figure 3). It is not difficult to find that in the past 20 years, the number of entity lists has grown by leaps and bounds, and the regional focus of U.S. entity control has shifted from Russia and the Middle East to our country.
The basic characteristics of technology export control
By sorting out the development and main measures of foreign technology export control policies, we can discover technologyNZ Escorts Export control carries a strong national will and is a means to achieve specific political, military and diplomatic interests. It has four main characteristics.
Technology export controls are based onBased on technical advantages and profit considerations. Countries that implement technology Sugar Daddy export controls usually have leading technological advantages and technological innovation capabilities. Only when the controlled technology has international Only when there is strategic value, it is necessary to implement strict export controls. Export control involves both national security interests and economic interests. These two interests are closely related and contradictory. If we pursue the economic benefits of exports, we may harm national security. On the other hand, if we pursue the security benefits of control, we will have to pay economic benefits. Therefore, the technology export control policies of various countries have been constantly swinging and balancing between national security and economic interests. However, generally speaking, they are based on national strategic needs and fully consider the technological advantages of the country compared with the controlled country and the technology of the controlled country. Tighten or relax technology export control policies for controlled countries on the basis of independent capabilities.
Technology export control has become an important means in the game between great powers. At present, scientific and technological innovation has become the main battlefield of international strategic games, and technology export control is an important means to strengthen the country’s competitiveness. On the one hand, implementing export controls on domestic advanced technologies can take the initiative in international competition. During the period of mercantilism, in order to ensure its dominant position in the manufacturing field, Britain strictly prohibited the outflow of advanced equipment and skilled workers. During the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, the United States had always implemented strict export controls on high-tech products to the Soviet Union, using it as a tool to contain the Soviet Union’s development. In recent years, competition around the commanding heights of science and technology has been unprecedentedly fierce, and countries have become more aware of using export controls to protect “technological leadership.” On the other hand, export controls can also be used as a powerful tool to counter other countries’ trade policies. In order to counter the abuse of export controls by the United States, our country has also continuously improved its own export control system and introduced the “Export Control Law” to use export controls to safeguard national security and interests.
Technology export control standards continue to be dynamically adjusted, reflecting Newzealand Sugar the direction of technological change. In order to implement more precise technology export controls, developed countries/regions will pay close attention to the latest global technologies, market trends and international situations, and continue to dynamically adjust technology export control standards. While strictly preventing the outflow of cutting-edge and sensitive technologies with internationally leading advantages, Allow the export of relatively backward and less sensitive technologies. In August 2022, BIS strengthened export controls on electronic design automation (EDA) software. All exports of EDA software to Chinese companies must apply for a license; in September, it also ordered to tighten the export of high-performance chips by U.S. chip design companies to China. . In addition to taking strict control measures themselves, the controlling countries also actively promote NZ Escorts the establishment of an international export control alliance andGuide the establishment of control processes and content that are consistent or compatible with them to improve the efficiency of technology export control.
Technology export control targets a wide range of subjects, ranging from tangible technology to intangible knowledge. Technology export controls are not only controls on the technology itself, but also include controls on the carriers of the technology – products, organizations and their personnel, and even restrictions on the formation process and acquisition methods of the technology. Major developed Zelanian sugar countries/regions have stricter controls on technology exports. On the one hand, they comprehensively use various control lists to ban or Control the spread of core technical knowledge, as well as the illegal outflow of related software, hardware, components and even supporting infrastructure and technology; on the other hand, set up higher technical barriers to technology transfer in international trade and propose various new control requirements . Among them, the principles of “end user”, “end use” and “comprehensive control” are widely used in the export control practices of various countries.
The development trend and impact of foreign technology export controls on China
Since the founding of New China, developed countries represented by the United States have been implementing technology export controls on China. , but the degree of restrictions varies at different times based on the international political situation and domestic economic, diplomatic and other interests at that time. Entering the 21st century, as my country has firmly become the world’s second largest economy, with many scientific and technological indicators among the best in the world, developed countries continue to tighten controls on technology exports to China, and control measures have taken on new characteristics.
Strengthen strategic competition and focus on strategic high-tech fields
The United States provided permanent legislation for current technology export control practices in the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 foundation to safeguard U.S. leadership and technological superiority. The EU will amend the EU Dual-use Items Export Control Regulations in 2021 to strengthen its ability to respond to new security risks and emerging technologies. Japan will amend the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Law in 2023 to add export controls on dozens of products in the cutting-edge semiconductor field to protect Japan’s strategic independence.
Strengthen export controls in traditional strategic high-tech NZ Escorts fields. As of the end of June 2023, CCL has restricted the export of products and technologies to my country in 462 categories and 2,732 items, that is, 64.33% of the categories and 76.82% of the items are not allowed to be exported to my country; among them, sensitive products and technologies are not allowed to be exported to China. Export controls on equipment, software and technology are particularly strict. Since 2018, export controls on traditional competitive strategic technology fields such as semiconductors and supercomputers have been intensified. For example, the upper limit of the technical parameters of semiconductors exported to China has been continuously raised, and three types of products with advanced technology have been explicitly suppressed; Japan and the Netherlands have issued semi-canonicalShe couldn’t say anything about this truth, let alone expose it, just because it was her son’s filial piety towards her, and she had to change it. The conductor restriction order affects 23 types of semiconductor equipment. At the same time, the scope of application of foreign direct product rules has been continuously expanded, the review and supervision scope of end users and end uses have been strengthened, and the space for Chinese entities to obtain high-end chips from the international market has been greatly reduced by setting up “guardrail” regulations.
Strengthen export controls in key and emerging technology areas. The United States passed the revised “Export Control Reform Act” in 2018 and added the concept of “Emerging Technologies and Basic Technologies”. In 2020, it released the “National Strategy for Critical and Emerging Technologies”, proposing 20 projects including advanced computing, advanced manufacturing, aerospace engines, etc. A list of key and emerging technologies, and the list will be updated in 2022 to further refine the direction of the technology field and list the sub-technologies of each emerging technology. The EU’s new export control regulations for dual-use items in 2021 also include new controls on emerging dual-use technologies such as network surveillance items. Under the provisions of the new legislation, BIS has successively issued special control policies for specific technical fields such as artificial intelligence technology, quantum information technology, and biotechnology, and has copied export control law enforcement for traditional strategic competitive fields to key and emerging technology fields and its subfields.
Aim at key technologies for precise control. As of May 2023, a total of 97 indicators of controlled technology products in the CCL have changed, of which 88 indicators targeted at my country’s controls have changed. On the one hand, control indicators are becoming more and more sophisticated in areas where our country has made breakthroughs in core technologies and achieved market-oriented applications; on the other hand, we keep a close eye on key industrial elements and impose all-round restrictions on all aspects of the innovation chain and industrial chain. For example, on October 7, 2022, BIS announced new regulations on “Implementing New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductor Manufacturing Items Exported to China”, adjusting the battery energy density control parameters from 250 Wh/kg to 350 Wh/kg , the reason for the adjustment is precisely because our country has made relevant technological breakthroughs in the field of battery products. The control content of semiconductor device testing equipment has not changed.
Expand the target scope and make the control objects more extensive
Since 2017, the frequency of updating the control list of foreign entities, the scale of control, and the focus of control have all changed significantly. With the changes, a large number of technology companies, scientific research institutions, universities and individual citizens in our country have been included in the listNZ Escorts.
The number of restricted entities has increased significantly. In the nearly 20 years since 1997, the U.S.’s export controls on China have been in a relatively stable stage, with an average of about 10 entities being included in the list every year. However, since 2018, the number of controlled entities in my country has increased sharply, and it is still in a frequent state. development stage (Figure 4). As of July 2023, my country has been included in the BIS entity listThe total number of entities (including entities in Hong Kong) has reached 696, including 495 enterprises, accounting for 71.12%, and 114 scientific research institutes, accounting for 16.38%; in addition, there are 13 universities, 22 government agencies, and individuals 52.
Target leading technology entities. Through Zelanian Escort, entities with poor relevance to science and technology and small-scale enterprises were screened out. After identification and sorting, a total of 209 institutions were included. The BIS entity list mainly involves 83 R&D and production units in the fields of microelectronics and optoelectronics, 54 networks and communications, 37 marine technology, and 35 computers, software and development. It can be seen that high-tech companies that already have certain technological and market advantages, scientific research institutions and universities involved in the military industry have become the targets of foreign control in recent years. At the same time, related parties and partners of these institutions have also been listed as targets of control.
Strengthen tool linkage and make control measures more systematic
With the comprehensive expansion of technological competition, investment review, export control, alliance formation, strengthened information disclosure, A series of measures such as restricting the flow of talents together constitute the regulatory toolkit of developed countries, which comprehensively blocks the outflow of advanced technologies.
Integrate export controls with investment review. In 2018, the United States introduced the Foreign Investment Risk Assessment Modernization Act, which broadened the scope of review objects and refined key technologies, especially transactions involving sensitive technologies; in 2022, it will strengthen the review of 27 industries involving US companies such as chips, semiconductors, and aircraft. Investment review in key technology areas; in August 2023, setSugar Daddy to opposeSugar DaddyThe foreign investment review mechanism restricts U.S. entities from investing in China’s semiconductor and microelectronics, quantum information technology, artificial intelligence and other fields. Many European countries also continue to tighten foreign investment regulatory policies and law enforcement. In 2019, the EU promulgated the first “Foreign Direct Investment Review Regulations”. In 2021, Germany implemented a new “Foreign Trade and Payments Regulations”, and the United Kingdom passed the “National Security and Investment Bill” to further expand foreign investment restrictions in sensitive areas.
Promote the formation ofMultilateral technical alliance. In addition to increasingly strict unilateral controls, the United States has made full use of multilateral mechanisms such as the Wassenaar Agreement to continuously integrate emerging and basic Sexual technologies were included in the “Wassenaar List” and hindered participating countries from exporting related technologies and products to my country; at the same time, they took the lead in launching multiple initiatives or actions to suppress my country’s scientific and technological development. For example, in 2018, a multilateral action on sensitive technologies including 15 countries was launched to formulate restrictive measures to hinder my country’s acquisition of advanced technologies; in 2021, a trade and technology committee was established with the European Union, with a coordination export control working group to conduct research on sensitive dual-use technologies. Collaborative control; convene an annual export control policy meeting to “establish an international cooperation network” in 2022; launch the “Indo-Pacific Economic Framework” in Asia, try to form a “Chip Quad Alliance”, and establish key and emerging technology work with Japan, Australia and India Group etc.
The impact of foreign technology export controls on our country
The increasingly upgraded technology export controls in developed countries have made us NZ Escorts my country is facing severe external constraints in the accelerated evolution period of a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation, which has brought great risks and challenges to our country’s scientific and technological progress, economic development and industrial security. .
This makes the problem of “stuck neck” in key core technologies more prominent. Since the reform and opening up, in the context of the division of labor in the global industrial chain, my country has long been in a position of technological follower and industrial dependence, and there is widespread dependence on foreign countries to varying degrees for key core technologies. Especially in many key areas such as industrial motherboards, high-end chips, basic software and hardware, aerospace engines, advanced scientific instruments, and basic materials, it is difficult to achieve breakthroughs in a short period of time due to high technical thresholds and difficulty in industrialization. The large-scale structural blockade of developed countries against the above-mentioned high-tech industries and key core technologies has hindered my country’s high-tech development process and made it possible for my country to fall into the dilemma of “low-end lock-in”. At the same time, whenever my country overcomes relevant control technical standards, foreign countries promptly relax controls or raise technical parameters by one generation, suppressing my country’s related industries through market competition, which greatly improves the cost and efficiency of my country’s overcoming “stuck neck” technical problems. .
Seriously threatening the security of the industrial chain and supply chain. In addition to blocking key core technologies, raw materials, parts, equipment, components and testing equipment required for research and development in high-tech fields are strictly restricted. The interruption of the supply of these key items will undoubtedly expose my country’s industrial chain to external products, parts or components. The impact of technology supply and chain interruptions. However, the cycle from R&D and design to commercialized finished products for high-tech products is long. Foreign countries also restrict the introduction of talents, technical exchanges, academic cooperation, etc., cutting off the possibility of my country’s acquisition of core technologies and products from the source. Therefore, “cutoffs” in a short period of time will lead to industrial chain supplyThe supply chain is partially blocked or broken. In the near future, once the semiconductor restriction policies of the United States, Europe and Japan form a joint control, the supply chain gap in my country’s semiconductor industry will become more serious.
International academic exchanges and cooperation have been seriously hindered. In 2018, the United States released the “China Action Plan” to investigate hundreds of researchers on Sino-U.S. cooperation projects in the name of “national security.” It banned domestic scientific research institutions and personnel from participating in my country’s talent introduction plan, and adopted measures to deny and delay visa applications. , revoking long-term visas to the United States, tightening review procedures and other measures Newzealand Sugar restrict the exchange of Chinese personnel in the United States, seriously hindering normal international exchanges cooperate. In May 2022, an analysis by “Nature” found that the number of collaborative papers between Chinese and American authors dropped in 2021. From 2019 to 2021, the number of authors of papers co-signed by Chinese and American scientific research institutions dropped by more than 20%. In 2021, the United States denied visas to at least 2,000 Chinese students studying science, technology, engineering and mathematics; from January to October 2022, the number of Chinese student visas in the United States dropped by 38% year-on-year.
my country’s technology export control system needs to be improved urgently. In order to effectively counter foreign technology export control measures, Zelanian sugar officially implemented the “Export Control Law of the People’s Republic of China” and the “Foreign Business Administration of the People’s Republic of China” in 2020. Investment Law”, updated the “China’s Catalog of Export Prohibited and Restricted Technologies”, and promulgated the “Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law of the People’s Republic of China”, “Measures for Blocking Improper Extraterritorial Application of Foreign Laws and Measures”, “Unreliable Entity List Regulations” and other rules and regulations in 2021, The legal system and system for technical safety review and export control have been basically established. However, compared with foreign technology export control practices that have been implemented for a long time, my country’s technology export control system has been established for a short time. There are problems such as vague definition of control objects, lack of supporting administrative regulations or departmental rules, and slow update frequency of lists. The export control system is not operable enough. In the face of foreign “long-arm jurisdiction” actions and technical control measures, it is still in the stage of passive response and temporary countermeasures, and cannot provide sufficient and effective support to Chinese entities.
my country’s response strategy
In recent years, the United States and Western countries have increasingly strengthened technology export controls against China, which illustrates that my country has made scientific and technological progress in important fields. At the same time, it also exposed shortcomings in some key core technology areas. At present, in order to win the initiative and priority of development in the context of intensified competition among major powers and global scientific and technological changes, our country urgently needs to improve its modern technology export control system, enhance its ability to systemize scientific and technological innovation, and accelerate the realization of high-level scientific and technological self-reliance and self-reliance. Play a greater role in global science and technology governance.
Strengthen the construction of the export control system and enhance reciprocal countermeasures
Optimize and improve my country’s technology export control legal system and system. With the continuous improvement of scientific and technological strength, our country urgently needs to establish and improve a modern technology export control system that takes into account national security and interests and effectively fulfills its international obligations. On the one hand, we should draw on international common practice and combine it with my country’s development reality to issue supporting policies such as the Export Control Law Implementation Regulations as soon as possible, clearly define the items and subjects under jurisdiction, establish a technology export control mechanism with the participation of multiple departments, and clarify the responsibilities of each department. tasks, strengthen mutual communication, collaboration and work linkage, and enhance the operability of the system. On the other hand, we actively prepare effective counter-sanctions measures, improve our country’s Sugar Daddy advantageous technology control mechanism, and build a national technology safety control list system. Establish a normalized selection mechanism and expert advisory committee to promptly update and iterate technical control standards to better protect my country’s legitimate interests.
Strengthen the ability to respond to foreign technology export controls. Organize national high-end think tanks and other specialized institutions and forces to Sugar Daddy pay close attention to the latest developments in technology export control in the United States, Europe and Japan, and strengthen Intelligence analysis and prediction of various control lists, and in-depth analysis of export control intentions, trends and measures towards China. For example, comprehensively review the laws and regulations related to technology export control in the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries and regions, study the international experience in export control law enforcement, and conduct a review of Zelanian sugar Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the contents of the control list, strengthen the pertinence of decision-making, and formulate and implement technical research plans in key areas. Changes in foreign export control lists to China should be used as an important basis for measuring my country’s scientific and technological progress and the effectiveness of key research.
Accelerate the establishment of a normalized technology risk assessment and monitoring and early warning mechanism. Accurately study and judge the potential impact of changes in foreign item lists on my country’s scientific and technological development and industrial security, and identify technical breakpoints and blocking points that threaten the security of the industrial chain and supply chain. Make full use of the new generation of information technology to strengthen risk monitoring and assessment of key industries such as national defense, information, and manufacturing and key core technologies in the global supply chain, and regularly track key technological breakthroughs and major strategies in major countries and regions such as the United States, Europe, and Japan. and other possible security issues, to achieve real-time monitoring, situational awareness and security early warning of technical risks.
Guide, encourage and promote enterprises to improve their risk prevention capabilities. Guide foreign-related technology trading enterprises to strengthen the study of new foreign export control regulations, strengthen inter-departmental coordination and cooperation, from information collection and release, trade promotion and facilitation, financial policies and services, overseas investment insurance and legal security protectionProvide support, guarantee and assistance to enterprises in various aspects. Guide enterprises to improve their export control compliance capabilities and levels, and establish a compliance review mechanism and a special training mechanism for relevant practitioners that comply with relevant national technology export control requirements, including the Export Control Law of the People’s Republic of China, based on the actual situation of the enterprise. Promote and guide enterprises to strengthen technology export control compliance.
Strengthen strategic technological research capabilities and accelerate the promotion of scientific and technological independence and self-reliance
Convert foreign item control lists into my country’s key core technology task lists. Technology export control is a “mirror”. By analyzing changes in foreign technology export control, it can reflect the current status and weak links of my country’s international technology and industrial competitiveness. We should give full play to the advantages of the new national system, systematically lay out “stuck” technologies in key areas, organize and mobilize effective forces and resources from the government, market, society and other aspects to promote substantial breakthroughs in key core technologies. Coordinate the major national needs and the technical shortcomings of related industries, and jointly develop industry-university-research institutes to conquer the key core technologies of the industry and make every effort to ensure the safety and stability of the industrial chain and supply chain. Simultaneously promote the research on “stuck neck” technology and the construction of industrial innovation ecology, and cultivate and strengthen new momentum for industrial development.
Pre-emptively lay out advantageous key technologies and cutting-edge technologies in emerging fields. Aim at the development frontier of emerging and basic technologies around the world, identify key common technologies, cutting-edge leading technologies, modern engineering technologies, disruptive technologies, etc., establish a key technology evaluation index system in emerging fields, and select advantageous key technologies and cutting-edge technologies for key support. Strengthen basic research and underlying technology research and development, increase capital investment, enhance original source capabilities, lay a solid foundation for the development of science and technology, and get rid of dependence on foreign technology. Focus on key areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum technology, biotechnology, and clean energy in the strategic game between China and the United States, study and formulate technology and industrial development roadmaps, coordinate the promotion of technology application and industrialization, open up new areas and new tracks for development, and cultivate new competitive advantages. .
Accelerate the cultivation of local application market. Innovate the government procurement system, build demonstration application scenarios, create and cultivate domestic demand markets, and promote the industrial application of key core technological achievements. Establish and improve the risk compensation mechanism for domestically produced applications, improve fiscal and financial policies for the first (set) and first batch applications in key areas, and encourage leading companies to try out domestically produced equipment and core software and hardware. Build a domestic application investment and financing system, combine tax incentives, financial support and other methods to promote the continuous adoption of domestic core technologies by enterprises, and build a good application ecosystem that “dare to use, are willing to use, and want to use”.
Accelerate the improvement of enterprises’ independent innovation capabilities. Most of those included in the entity control list are high-tech enterprises with development potential in their industries or fields and the ability to compete with similar technologies and industries in developed countries. Enterprises should be guided to use independent innovation as the internal driving force for development and consolidate enterprises. Technical capabilities to prevent and resolve external risks. Promote the aggregation of various innovation elements to enterprises, and encourage enterprises to increase investment in R&D, build R&D platforms, and participate inDevelop independent technology and product systems through major scientific and technological projects, forming innovation consortiums, and strengthening the construction of intellectual property management systems, improve the domestic substitution rate of key core technologies and products, and get rid of dependence on foreign technology.
Optimize the ecological environment for independent innovation and enhance global scientific and technological governance capabilities
Build a scientific and technological innovation highland that gathers global resources. Formulate a more active, open, and effective talent policy, establish a long-term mechanism for overseas talents, and encourage outstanding international scientific and technological talents to develop in China. At the same time, we must pay attention to the management and control of risks in the introduction of overseas talents, and establish and improve corresponding compliance and risk prevention mechanisms. Reform and improve the supporting mechanisms for foreign talents to work and live in China, and create an institutional environment that is internationally competitive and attractive. Support overseas universities and research institutions in setting up scientific and technological innovation bases in China, and encourage foreign investors to invest in setting up R&D centers. Promote the internationalization of science and technology organizations and attract international science and technology organizations to develop in China.
Cultivation of a globally competitive open innovation ecosystem. Always maintain an open and cooperative attitude, expand scientific and technological exchanges and cooperation with key areas, key countries and international organizations, and actively integrate into the world Innovation NetworkNewzealand SugarNetwork. Deeply participate in global science and technology governance, put forward Chinese solutions and contribute Chinese wisdom around the common challenges of all mankind such as climate change, energy security, ecological environmental protection, and infectious diseases. Establish a global scientific research fund, set global scientific and technological innovation topics, take the lead in organizing and actively participating in international big science plans and big science projects, and strengthen Sino-foreign joint research and development. Support scientific research institutions and enterprises to “go global”, build important platforms such as offshore science and technology innovation centers and overseas R&D bases, and enhance “localization” contributions.
(Authors: He Defang, China Society for Science and Technology Assessment and Achievements Management; Li Guangjian, Peking University; Tang Fuqiang, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security; Yang Fangjuan, Science and Technology Assessment Center of the Ministry of Science and Technology. “Proceedings of the Chinese Academy of Sciences” Feed)